All Comments on BIMB Reload

Login to comment.
Edwin Ng
Like · Reply
EPF also no eye see, dispose already
Owen Lee
Like · Reply
MBOW 5.0 PUBLIC|BIMB
周期:30M|4H|1D|1W|1M|3M
现价:2.260
━━━━━━━━━━
一|MARKET STATE
BIMB 当前处于:
Support Breakdown Test
(支撑破位后的承接测试)
中期结构原本在 2.30—2.38 区间反复平衡。
但这几天卖压加快释放,价格跌穿主成交带下缘。
现在重点不是反攻。
而是:
2.24—2.26 能否形成短线接受。
守住:
进入技术修复。
继续失守:
回撤空间继续打开。
━━━━━━━━━━
二|TIMEFRAME TRANSITION FLOW
30M
连续弱势横移
MACD负值延伸
Fisher深负区继续下压
ADX快速拉高
OBV低位横移
状态:
Short-Term Failure Pressure
说明:
短线卖压还没完全释放。
——
4H
跌破 2.32 主结构
MACD继续走弱
Fisher负值扩大
ADX明显抬升
OBV持续流出
状态:
Breakdown Active
说明:
4H控制权仍在卖方。
——
Daily
长阴跌破区间底
MACD负值扩大
Fisher持续下压
ADX重新上升
OBV继续创新低
状态:
Daily Breakdown Expansion
说明:
日线进入主动释放阶段。
——
Weekly
已触及主要成交密集区
MACD回落至零轴附近
Fisher跌入负值
ADX持续回落
OBV偏弱
状态:
Weekly Support Test
说明:
周线还没全面失守,
但已来到关键防守区。
——
Monthly
横向整理结构
MACD接近底部平衡
Fisher尝试回升失败
ADX偏低
状态:
Mid-Term Rebalance
——
3M
长期仍属大型横盘结构
MACD接近收敛
Fisher回到中轴附近
OBV中性
状态:
Long-Term Neutral Balance
━━━━━━━━━━
三|MULTI-TIMEFRAME RESONANCE
30M + 4H:
卖压释放。
Daily:
breakdown active。
Weekly:
支撑测试。
Monthly + 3M:
长期仍属平衡。
整体属于:
Short-Term Breakdown
inside Long-Term Balance Structure
━━━━━━━━━━
四|STRUCTURE LEVELS
Resistance
2.280 → 短线第一反压|63%
2.320 → 4H supply zone|75%
2.380 → 主成交密集区|84%
Support
2.240 → 当前支撑|68%
2.200 → 日线承接区|79%
2.100 → 周线主支撑|87%
Failure Zone
跌破 2.200 并接受
→ correction 加速
━━━━━━━━━━
五|PATH A
Technical Rebound
概率:40%
时间惯性:2–5 trading days
条件:
2.24守住
30M止跌
卖压放缓
结构推演:
2.260
→ 2.280
→ 2.320
若重新站回 2.32:
结构可进入修复。
━━━━━━━━━━
六|PATH B
Deeper Correction
概率:45%
时间惯性:3–8 trading days
条件:
2.24失守
4H继续弱化
ADX维持上升
结构推演:
2.260
→ 2.200
→ 2.100
目前略偏向这条。
━━━━━━━━━━
七|FAILURE STRUCTURE
Failure Path
概率:15%
ROOT
2.24防守失败
LEAD
4H持续走弱
MID
2.20失守
TERMINAL
跌破 2.10
RELEASE
回撤 toward 2.00
当前阶段:
Early Failure Pressure Active
━━━━━━━━━━
八|FINAL STRUCTURE STATE
BIMB 长期大结构还没坏。
但短线与日线卖压正在扩张。
关键观察:
2.24—2.26 能否稳住。
稳住:
技术修复机会出现。
继续跌破:
2.20 / 2.10 风险升高。
当前属于:
Long-Term Balance

Short-Term Failure Pressure Active
Disclaimer:
本分析仅基于你提供图表中可见的技术结构、动能与资金参与状态,不构成投资建议。市场有风险,请结合自身交易计划与风险管理独立判断。BIMB is currently trading inside a support breakdown test. The medium-term structure had been balancing between 2.30 and 2.38, but recent selling pressure accelerated and price slipped below the lower edge of that range. The immediate focus is no longer on recovery upside. The market is now testing whether 2.24–2.26 can stabilize and become a short-term acceptance zone. If buyers defend this area, a technical rebound can develop. If it fails, downside pressure may continue expanding.
Shorter timeframes remain weak. On the 30M chart, price is moving sideways near the lows while MACD stays negative, Fisher remains deep in negative territory, ADX continues rising, and OBV stays depressed. This shows selling pressure has not fully cleared. The 4H chart confirms breakdown pressure after losing the 2.32 structure zone, with momentum weakening and participation continuing to fade. Daily structure is now in active breakdown expansion, with MACD turning further negative, Fisher pressing lower, and OBV making fresh lows. Weekly is now testing a major participation zone near support, while Monthly and 3M remain inside a broader long-term balancing structure rather than a major trend breakdown.
Path A (40%) — Technical Rebound
If BIMB successfully holds above 2.24 and selling pressure starts slowing, price may attempt a rebound toward 2.28 and then retest 2.32. A confirmed move back above 2.32 would improve short-term structure and reduce immediate downside pressure.
Path B (45%) — Deeper Correction
If 2.24 loses acceptance and 4H weakness continues, the stock may retrace toward 2.20 and potentially test 2.10. Based on visible momentum and OBV, this remains the slightly stronger short-term path.
Failure Path (15%) — Structural Breakdown
If the market begins accepting below 2.10, weekly support may weaken further and downside pressure could extend toward the 2.00 zone. That would shift the stock from long-term balance into a more defensive structure.
Current structure:
Long-Term Balance
+
Short-Term Failure Pressure Active
Disclaimer:
This analysis is based solely on visible technical structure, momentum behavior, participation flow, and market-state transitions from the provided charts. It is not financial advice or a guarantee of future market performance. Market conditions can change rapidly, and all trading decisions carry risk. Always apply proper risk management and independent judgment before making investment decisions.
Show more
Lynne Cheong
Like · Reply
@OWEN帮我看看5258这只股.谢谢你
Owen Lee
逛逛下银行股,现在才看到你的留言
Like · 10 hours · translate
王俊凯
2 Like · Reply
垃圾银行,马铲管理就是差
Ck Ang
Limit down down
Like · 1 day · translate
M Hafiz
Revenue grows every year and yet the net profit stays flat (declining profit margin). That in it self tells something. Management have to do something about it to convince investor that they're spending the money wisely.
Like · 13 hours · translate
ting pang eng
2 Like · Reply
The Good (Positives)

1. Strong Asset Growth
· Total assets grew 8.7% YoY to RM106.8 billion.
· Gross financing grew 5.9% YoY to RM76.1 billion.
· Customer deposits and investment accounts grew 9.2% YoY to RM88.1 billion.
2. Healthy Capital Adequacy
· Total Capital Ratio stood at 18.4% (well above regulatory minimum).
· CET1 ratio at 13.6%, indicating strong capital buffers.
3. Improved Asset Quality
· Gross impaired financing ratio improved to 1.02% (from 0.97% in Dec 2025).
· Net allowance for impairment on financing decreased by 32% YoY (from RM79.8m to RM54.2m).
4. Strong Liquidity and Funding Base
· Customer deposits grew to RM65.5 billion.
· Investment accounts grew significantly to RM22.6 billion.
· Liquidity position supported by high cash and short-term funds (RM2.84 billion).
5. Stable Net Income (YoY)
· Total net income increased slightly YoY to RM605 million (from RM587.8 million).
· Net fund-based income grew, driven by higher financing and investment income.
6. Post-Q1 Capital Raising
· Completed issuance of RM1.0 billion Subordinated Sukuk Murabahah in April 2026, strengthening capital further.

---

The Bad (Challenges & Concerns)

1. Lower Profitability (YoY & QoQ)
· Profit after tax (PAZT) fell 8.9% YoY to RM115.0 million.
· QoQ profit dropped sharply by 34.3% from RM175.1 million in 4Q2025.
2. Higher Operating Expenses
· Total overheads increased 7.7% YoY (RM17.9 million higher).
· Personnel expenses rose 8.0% YoY.
· Establishment costs (IT, depreciation, rentals) increased.
3. Lower Non-Fund Based Income
· Non-fund based income fell 18.1% YoY due to:
· Losses from revaluation of investment securities.
· Lower foreign exchange income.
· Lower fees and commission income.
4. Higher Finance Costs
· Finance costs increased 11.3% YoY (RM4.6 million higher), driven by higher costs on subordinated sukuk.
5. Decline in Net Income (QoQ)
· Net income fell 8.2% QoQ (RM59.4 million lower) due to:
· One-off property disposal gain in 4Q2025 not repeated.
· Net loss from FVTPL revaluation.
6. Lower Net Assets Per Share
· Net assets per share fell from RM3.56 (Dec 2025) to RM3.53 (March 2026), due to dividend payments and fair value losses.
Show more
Daniel Tan
7 Like · Reply
Get Ready All... Standby Now.. Time to Buckle Seat Belt Tight Tight... Cepat Cepat naik Rocket lorrr.. Power sudah mahu Mari... Go Go Go
Yong Jason
hahaha 不错go down 了
Like · 4 days · translate
来都来了
几十开始慢慢收。。。。
Like · 4 days · translate
Ahmad Amzar
1 Like · Reply
Poor performance
Ling Sei Luen
17 Like · Reply
2.03 进 ~ 记录下 … 5 年后再回来看
金融科技
刚刚最低加仓了。。。。休息。。免得受伤
1 Like · 1 week · translate
Yong Jason
Ling 等 225 嘻嘻
Like · 1 week · translate
Heng Fa Lim
1 Like · Reply
每间银行都上升,BIMB在下跌,为什么???
Rene Wong
做马来人生多和烂账多........
1 Like · 2 months · translate
Tok Tiong
应该是因为bimb不在 index 30里。
Like · 2 months · translate
Heng Fa Lim
3 Like · Reply
bimb快要上来2.50 go go
Mohd Azam
if we look closer at the report. Bank islam IT transformation cost it 52million more than 2024. its revenue catching up with the IT cost due to application revamp and back end revamp. IMO next quarter it will get higher than this year Q1.
Show more
2 Like · 2 months · translate
mrs xlg
收票时间到等拿股息
1 Like · 2 months · translate