Our website is made possible by displaying non-intrusive online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling or pausing your ad blocker.
Astro actually gains some breathing room from RTM’s exit, even though at first glance it looks like a setback. Here’s why:
- Cost relief: Carrying RTM channels meant paying rental and transmission fees. With RTM pulling out, Astro saves on these costs, which helps margins at a time when its earnings are under pressure.
- Portfolio focus: RTM’s channels (TV1, TV2, Okey) are free-to-air and widely accessible. Their presence on Astro didn’t add much exclusivity. Dropping them allows Astro to concentrate on premium, differentiated content — sports, international rights, and Astro Originals — which are the real drivers of subscription value.
- Negotiation signal: By not caving to RTM’s rental demands, Astro shows discipline in cost negotiations. This strengthens its bargaining position with other content providers, especially as it renegotiates sports rights like the FIFA World Cup.
- Digital pivot: Losing RTM may accelerate Astro’s push into OTT (Sooka, Astro Go) and fibre bundles, where it can differentiate with exclusive content and integrated services rather than duplicating what’s already free elsewhere.
In short, Astro avoids paying for channels that don’t boost subscriber stickiness, trims costs, and sharpens its focus on content that truly matters for retention and growth.
